Subject	OK I have the other set of graphs with boost
Posted by	Rob'Z on December 11, 2011 at 8:06 PM
	This message has been viewed 362 times.
In Reply To	Dyno results from CNC'd 54mm TBs posted by Rob'Z on December 10, 2011 at 04:35 PM
Message	This was the last stock TB run and the first 54mm TB run, the motor was heat soaked a bit from sitting hence the dip (we think it pulled timing) but it supports the low end increase. These two pulls were heavily loaded in 4th gear while the graph from the first post was unloaded only using the weight of the drum. I still want to see these on someone elses car before I stand behind a claim of 75 RWTQ increase at 2900 RPM. Note, the boost shown is usually 2psi lower than the reading from boost controllers and guages in the car due to the long line from the engine to the computer. My AVC-R had peak recalls of .71 and .72 during the four runs. Rob SRC="http://ttp://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c359/RobZ90TT/AZR%201 0/beyondsig.jpg">
Follow Ups	Dyno results from CNC'd 54mm TBs - Rob'Z 16:35:05 12/10/11 both dyno's on same day? (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 16:39:26 12/10/11 Yes indeed, 39m 57s between pulls - Rob'Z 17:05:21 12/10/11 Impressive results...Looking to see more on highly modded Zs (n/m) - TheTwinZ (Peru) 17:08:31 12/10/11 All you did was swap TBs? Stock plenum? (n/m) - ZiNnYc 17:46:04 12/10/11 I opened up the inlets to ~65mm - Rob'Z 18:07:33 12/10/11 Will be interesting to see what the 65's will do for your Z - The Hawk 19:33:36 12/10/11 Could 60+ TB's possibly increase perf w stock piping? (n/m) - ZXoltan 20:40:44 12/10/11 Of course....I mean, they did with 54mm so... - The Hawk 12:59:58 12/11/11 Are you going to have another offering other than the 54mm? (n/m) - ZiNnYc 20:09:48 12/10/11 Yes, US made 62mm TBs - Rob'Z 21:08:55 12/10/11 I wonder about idle resolution...interested in results (n/m) - ZiNnYc 21:13:11 12/10/11 On the Ferrari TBs mine flowed .1 CFM less than stock - Rob'Z 22:58:32 12/10/11 Closed throttle (n/m) - Rob'Z 23:06:11 12/10/11 Looking forward to more data. On the business side, - ZiNnYc 12:11:19 12/11/11 Thanks for the advice/support - Rob'Z 12:27:15 12/11/11 Do you mean 54mm? 64mm Is not doable without plenum - Rob'Z 12:32:14 12/11/11 I dont mind altering the bolt holes - ZiNnYc 16:54:10 12/11/11 In that case send me some Stanza TB's - Rob'Z 17:21:31 12/11/11 ok...Id like to see some data though - ZiNnYc 17:56:53 12/11/11 I want in on this too - RobZ32 23:31:03 12/11/11 how about a video =] - mikehawkhertz 17:54:27 12/10/11 It sounds amazing. ;) - Rob'Z 18:08:43 12/10/11 Wow thats quite impressive. (n/m) - ztunerz 18:58:29 12/10/11 Dang, thats more than I would have expected. (n/m) - Wright (Ca) 19:05:30 12/10/11 Me too honestly. I want to do a before and after on another - Rob'Z 21:13:29 12/10/11 Any downside to shaving the throttle shaft? - ZXoltan 20:47:58 12/10/11 It's common in the racing industry - Rob'Z 21:11:26 12/10/11 The low end gain seems suspect to me since the engine is - LitlElvis 23:00:40 12/10/11 I agree -- when I switched to 60MM throttle bodies - The Devils Z 04:43:05 12/11/11 I'm still waiting for the digital charts with all the info - Rob'Z 11:12:33 12/11/11 Might have been caused by disturbance from the 15mm "step" - Hipendicular 11:27:07 12/11/11 Wouldnt such a "disturbance" make things worse...? - ZXoltan 12:07:43 12/11/11 The step is bigger using a stock TB vs a larger TB. (n/m) - Hipendicular 21:44:49 12/11/11 There is already a "step" with the stock setup - Rob'Z 12:29:30 12/11/11 Put me down for a set! (n/m) - new2boost 10:02:24 12/11/11 id like to see how they would do on my sport 700s (n/m) - Jason300zxTT 11:23:26 12/11/11 Me too! I got your email, sounds like a plan. (n/m) - Rob'Z 17:22:26 12/11/11 OK I have the other set of graphs with boost - Rob'Z 20:06:17 12/11/11 Crap, I think I figured it out - Rob'Z 20:45:47 12/11/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.